mBiodiversity as a matriztic derivation from Biodiversity

It is well known that the sound "mmmmmm" shape, from human criature origins, a special bio cultural synapomorphy that extends forward whereever humans are known living nowadays over this small planet.
mTheory was recently proposed as a equivalent, in spanish (mTeoría) to the well sounded term UnTheory, in english equivalent.
Thus, mTheory and UnTheory may be considered synonimous, with the great advantage that prevent, in this way, a certain possible ostracism towards that kind of polymathic language, because they think it is to much radical to take out All Theories as unusefull at all... may be...
In this new way, you write "mTheory" and another very diferent thing can be understood: that is, which we are trying to reflecting towards how the "new" holistic epistemology derived from the four or five new theories flying around what we call, the universality of human ecolocation, may be approach widing the scopes of what reductionist approach made available, all that before tha actual global sistemic revolution...

Well "mTheory", and any term you could find with this "m" particle at the beginning of the term, means that explicitly we try to approach knowledge under a fenomenal scope... a scope that guarantees that you and me are speaking about a certain level of concretion that prevent conversation become too much abstract and for that, far from the principles of a epistemology phenomenologically rooted...

"mTheory", as any meme, new or old, may be considered a fuzzy term, that lives in a universe of possibilities fluctuating at a "circular" (360º) pendulum...

Yes, from the beginning it is nor easy to imagine a circular pendulum, but it is possible to imagine one...

A circular 360º pendulum means, that possibilities always may be considered actualy infinite...

Fuzzy logic, and our own extension, or derivation, towards infimonikal logic (or matematical system), treat with infinite possibilities (between the black, and the white). Thus, in this case, black and white disappears as absolute and dichotomical-and-clearly-able-to-diferentiate-values.

In this way you are not moving between one extreme (may be ten, in classroom) and the other (zero). You may choose, using scientific fuzzy operating rules, discovered in the last sixties, by Zadeh, a circle image where you haven't any extreme at any side of a supossed right line.

You are thus thinking and counting in a more logical (systemic or complex) way...

All that systems are complementary. We have not old methods and new methods. We change the way we look at the world, and the world appears, "fulminantemente", as part of your "scientific team". You look at the world choosing, as a preliminary proof, two memes, and your own biological complex system as a dynamic and "within-the-searched-system-approach" epistemologist, and nothing more...

Well, in that infimonikal triad, you have you (see personal dimension in David Selby Global education), you have the world, (as-a-continuous-ecosystem) (or Gaya), and Bacteria, whose biology, and social ecology is taking towards absolute epistemological bankrupt to very much of what (human) sociologists was saying about (human) sociology (trans bacterial sociology)...

When you articulate in a dynamic systemic fashion that three levels or dimensions of your own personal, and scientific reality, it is no so easy to follow with the old dychotomies all around.

That is why "mTheory" seems a interesting trick to "maternalising" all modern (and old) science. (radykal niñarky)

OUED: The Liquid Web

Oued is the fruit of a network composed by Liquid Mind, Liquid Language and Liquid Web.
Mind (or thinking) and language are a inextricable unit.

From Zygmunt Baum Liquid society or democracy to liquid web throughout Liquid Mind and Language.

Formalized writings are those writings characterised by a formal and, or normalised language.

On the other hand we have the liberalization of language in not-formalised writings. For example in chats, or emails...

But in general we find that critical people writing in the web are too formalised or normalised, that is, following (con pulcritud) the rules of their correspondant rulers, that is the people that along the language history designed those rules conditioning our own way of writing and or speak.

European formal language systems have been constructed under political and religious systems governing during centuries. And thus, the language we use today, maybe to denounce the intromision of religion in the european science system, is clearly obsolete for that, because reproduces itself, from the grammar, and from the deep meanings, the same patterns we are denouncing or trying to ameliorate.

Please visit our guebys in the guay gueby gueb. Just two days ago we discover that the best form to describe our "crazy" endeavours through so "irregular" or "desorder" writing languages, is Liquid Language... and Liquid Web. For Liquid Web We Chose OUED, a very wet arabian word whose sounds approaches water, and that is very present as toponimic root for many iberian rivers and in the very close Mahgreb.

By destroying formalised language, deconstruing it, playing with it, looking at etymological roots, looking at the same word in different languages, playing with artexts in the way to flow in the fussion between "to write" and "to draw"... Now after all this experiment, we have enough elements to explain, in formal terms, the result as Liquid Web (and mind and language).

If you reach this point of our test it is because your own liquid mind. Thanks.