¿algunavez tepreguntaste silasbancas podíanestar deotramanera?

ah

ah
uhm

jueves, 25 de febrero de 2010

asiah úgel

sábado 20 de febrero de 2010

OUED: La Web de líquidos de
Oued es el fruto de una Red compuesta por líquido mente, el lenguaje y Liquid Liquid Web.Mente (o el pensamiento) y el lenguaje son una unidad indisoluble.De La Sociedad Zygmunt Baum líquido o la Democracia a la web de líquido en líquido y Mente formalizados Lenguaje.Escritos hijo Aquellos escritos caracteriza por las Naciones Unidas y oficial, o normalizar el lenguaje.Por otro lado tenemos la Liberalización de la lengua en los escritos de no-formal. Por ejemplo, en chats o mensajes de correo electrónico ... Pero en general nos Encontramos con que los críticos por escrito en la web son demasiado formalizado o normalizado, es decir, después (con pulcritud) las Normas de sus gobernantes corresponsal, es que El pueblo que a lo largo de la Historia de la lengua diseñado por las Normas acondicionado nuestra propia Manera de por escrito y ni hablar.Los Sistemas Europeos de lenguaje formal se han construido en los sistemas políticos y religiosos que Rigen Durante siglos. Y así, Utilizamos el lenguaje que hoy en día, tal vez para denunciar la Intromisión de la religión en el sistema científico europeo, es obsoleta Claramente por eso, Porque se reproducen, desde la gramática, y de los significados profundos, Los Mismos patrones que estamos Tratando de denunciar o para mejorar.Por guebys favor visite nuestra en la guay gueby Gueb. Hace apenas dos días, Descubrimos que la mejor forma de describir A NUESTROS "locos" a Través de Esfuerzos de manera "irregular" o "desorder" lenguas de escritura, es un líquido de idiomas ... y Liquid Web. Para líquidos Web elegimos Oued, una palabra árabe muy húmedo Cuyos sonidos enfoques de agua, y que está muy presente como toponimic raíz para muchos ríos ibéricos y en el Magreb muy cerca.Al destruir el lenguaje formal, deconstruing, jugando con él, en busca de las raíces etimológicas, mirando a la misma palabra en diferentes idiomas, jugando con artexts en la forma de flujo en la Fusión entre "escribir" y "dibujar" ... Ahora, Experimentar Después de todo esto, tenemos elementos suficientes para Explicar, en términos formales, el resultado como Liquid Web (y la mente y el idioma). Si usted llega este punto de la prueba, es Porque tu mente propio líquido. Gracias.
ES complaciencia Publicado por 04:28
Etiquetas: , , , , , ,

2 comentarios:

feministo dijo ...
Escribo en español como "güeby"
24 de febrero de 2010 05:47

La evaluación estratégica global dijo ...
... O como usted decideeeeeee líquidamente eah!
25 de febrero de 2010 01:35

sábado, 20 de febrero de 2010

OUED: The Liquid Web


Oued is the fruit of a network composed by Liquid Mind, Liquid Language and Liquid Web.
Mind (or thinking) and language are a inextricable unit.

From Zygmunt Baum Liquid society or democracy to liquid web throughout Liquid Mind and Language.

Formalized writings are those writings characterised by a formal and, or normalised language.

On the other hand we have the liberalization of language in not-formalised writings. For example in chats, or emails...

But in general we find that critical people writing in the web are too formalised or normalised, that is, following (con pulcritud) the rules of their correspondant rulers, that is the people that along the language history designed those rules conditioning our own way of writing and or speak.

European formal language systems have been constructed under political and religious systems governing during centuries. And thus, the language we use today, maybe to denounce the intromision of religion in the european science system, is clearly obsolete for that, because reproduces itself, from the grammar, and from the deep meanings, the same patterns we are denouncing or trying to ameliorate.

Please visit our guebys in the guay gueby gueb. Just two days ago we discover that the best form to describe our "crazy" endeavours through so "irregular" or "desorder" writing languages, is Liquid Language... and Liquid Web. For Liquid Web We Chose OUED, a very wet arabian word whose sounds approaches water, and that is very present as toponimic root for many iberian rivers and in the very close Mahgreb.

By destroying formalised language, deconstruing it, playing with it, looking at etymological roots, looking at the same word in different languages, playing with artexts in the way to flow in the fussion between "to write" and "to draw"... Now after all this experiment, we have enough elements to explain, in formal terms, the result as Liquid Web (and mind and language).

If you reach this point of our test it is because your own liquid mind. Thanks.

Quantum Mind Speed


When you have enough experimental sensorial work within sensosphere, you can achieve certain ideas that for other observers, may be considered phantastic or a mere illusion.

The speed with our mind-body react, through our own sensorial systems, to any change, or any diference within the ecosystem, we see or perceive in front of us, will be in relation with our own sensorial or perceptual experience. Remember the differences in our ways of living, more or less nurtured by direct sensorial experience or by more abstract approach.

Light travel 300.000 km in a second. Sun is at 8 minutes-light. The first sun-ray approaching your face this morning has traveled at this speed. All the landscape you see in front of you is bathing by sun-rays, traveling at this speed. The ability of your experimented visual sensorial systems to discover small changes in the landscape in front of you, depends of your speed to react to small changes in the landscape that are conditioned by the speed of photons bathing (scanning) your visual landscape.

After months practising sensorial work within sensosphere, I like to say that your mind can travel, or move, at light speed. To accept that, at least as a strong and useful intuition, it is enough that you will be aware (when you are actualy perceiving deeply any landscape) that your overall visual landscape have a light input (bossons, fotons, light-rays, light waves) characterised by this speed.

Well, within your own sensorial information system, you are managing an information input that is your visual landscape, characterised or conditioned by the speed of light. I noted that it is very good to make all these apparent redundancy commenting many times the speed of light as a crucial input of your every day visual sensorial experience. I think that, as a new idea, and or intuition, it is good to come more and more about it as, in this way,our own neurosensorial networks are producing more and more possibilities, more and more new ideas, and these new ideas are adding to previous ones in order to discover new ways to explanation, and to share with you readers, within the information system called collective knowledge (society).

We all are quantum living biologists


We are all quantum living biologists.
We may see a first distinction among profesional biologists and living biologists.
In the life of profesional biologists, two types of "sublifes" emerges: their own living biology, and the biology they profesionaly search, study or work.
Among profesional and not profesional biologists, we may see a common element in their lifes: the part of their lifes they dedicate to their living biology.

Profesional biologists are living also another type of biology, another type of life. It is like a second generation, or second order life: The part of their lives they dedicate planning the life of other people.

We may see diferences among these two parts in the life of profesional biologists. Among them we find bureaucracy, dominating many space of their (second order) biological profesional life. We also find programming, as a basic tool of profesional biologists. This programming is interrelated with projects, that they develop within a certain time lap. Also we find in the profesional biologists a certain separation from the people they are working and programming for. This separation seems in correspondence with diverse abstractions and theories, that dominate the profesional part of the life of profesional biologists.

In that separation, in the profesional life of profesional biologists, between profesional biologists and society, another aspect is also important.

If you look at the contents of the academic courses, developped by profesional biologists in their student life, your surprise will be great, after discovering that profesional biologists almost don't include social and human knowledge within their study programs. They mainly study "out-human" biology, that is, all biology excepting human biology. Yes, of course, they do study diferents aspect of human biology, affecting phisiology, histology, etc.... But they finish without to know how humankind works. The learn how certain parts of human body works. But they don't know almost anything about humankind and society works.

Of course, specialy if you reader are a profesional biologist, you would answer: biology belong to natural sciences, and not to social sciences.

Well, but if we were to solve the mental separation among humans and nature, we would take in account the contents of programs of profesional biologists. The paradox is that, maybe ecological economists, know better many aspects of human biology, that profesional biologists themselves. Specialy those aspects that put in front of us possible ways to sucess over actual global crisis. Human ecology is also human biology. This is the paradox. After more than one century of ecology revolution, as a system science, and the basis to understand humans role and interrelationships within biosphere, the absence of social aspects in biology studies make them obsolete.

Well, now I am going to talk from the living biologist point of view.

If you see about quantum biology in the web, you will find mainly those approaches that from quatum physics try to open a way to arrive to biology. All that as a "heroic" enterprise trying to join the last quantum physics with the last biology.

Our way will be diferent. We are going to approach quantum biology from perception, but with the aid of newest science, including biology. We have very good and newest science, still hiden from official academic curricula. When you converse with all that luxury newest science, published as higher order scientific papers, the main or basic tool is merely intuition, and imagination.

But if you read here "intuition and imagination", in relation to "serious science", maybe you think that we merely dream, or use phantasy, in a free but vacuous way, and so, only producing speculations but not "real" science.

Of course, if you are a scientist, mainly a specialist, not knowing almost anything about that last, newest science, you have the right to have that opinion.

For that reason, maybe our best success can come from our approach. One type of approach that is not only new, but it is also objective, in the way that it uses permanently, the diverse information our own perception systems channels within our ecosystems, our lives.

In general we accept that everyday life (living biology) of many people is far from the high levels of bureaucracy and abstractions that dominate the profesional part of the life of profesional biologists, and other profesionals.

Also many of that people have not been enclosed in classrooms for many years. And they haven't been forced to memorising so many abstract and theorethical things.

It is supossed that this people are more open to capt, to perceive the world through their perception systems.

One provisional conclusion maybe that, in general, more time living directly in the ecosystem, without abstract or theorethical mediations, means more sensibility, from our sensorial systems, to perceive the ecosystem, as a information system.

That is, human (information systems) that lives more time directly within ecosystems (information systems), and less time within abstract or theorethical grounds (information systems) have their sensorial (information systems) more enriched, with more experiential information.

It is supossed that we all have interest in humankind survival. But the information we have is very diferent, according to pass paragraphs. Of course all that information is important. The point here is the complementarity of all types of information. Social or popular knowledge is very important. Scientific knowledge is important too. And more important at all is: How to manage the symbiosis among these complementary knowlegde systems?

Diferent types of knowlegde systems. Diferent approaches to knowlegde. Complementary approach to life and to knowlegde.

Our approach comes from sensosphere. Sensosphere is nurtured through common sensing systems. Common sensing systems are equal for any human, for any people.

In our work within sensosphere, it is always possible the consensus among diferent observers; be them profesional scientist observers or "merely" living biologists. According to their own field of experience, every observer know more or less within any ecosystem.

For example, one human, or biologist, from europe, in his/her first travel to rainforest, don't know anything. The same for a rainforest human coming to europe for first time.

In the same vene, one campus gardener know different from a botanist, according to their own practical experience.

The point is that whatever two human you take, always will ve possible to reach a consensus. And this basis consensus may be with ecosystem. So we have: 1) you, 2) me, and 3) the ecosystem. That means that we (you and me) can reach a consensus about one aspect of ecosystem.

Another point is that the dimensions of variability in ecosystems can be of very highest orders than the orders of variation of ecosystems such as they are studied by profesionals.

Sensosphere is able to approach through intuitive quantum biology because:
1) we all are biologists and/ or observers
2) the high dimensions of variation in the information inputs with sensosphere approaches make them able to use transfinite numbers to describe the overall information system. This "oceanic" flow info, not only is perceived by our complex sensorial systems, but also by audio-visual devices of the type many people use every day to communicate themselves.